<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many Design Concepts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/how-many-design-concepts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/how-many-design-concepts</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Freelance Digital Designer Dave Ellis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:26:28 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rushworth</title>
		<link>http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/how-many-design-concepts/comment-page-1#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rushworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/?p=254#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>I only ever submit 1 design and go through the process, if it doesnt hit the mark then i go back and rething the goals of a project, the client gets billed for them all as i dont do spec work. usually the client doesnt really know what they want and if things prove too difficult then i take elements from the competitors and bastardize a site together... its not the best solution but sometimes clients dont want that, they want something they already know... sad but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only ever submit 1 design and go through the process, if it doesnt hit the mark then i go back and rething the goals of a project, the client gets billed for them all as i dont do spec work. usually the client doesnt really know what they want and if things prove too difficult then i take elements from the competitors and bastardize a site together&#8230; its not the best solution but sometimes clients dont want that, they want something they already know&#8230; sad but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Found on The Web 10/02/2009 &#171; The Blog of No Return</title>
		<link>http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/how-many-design-concepts/comment-page-1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Found on The Web 10/02/2009 &#171; The Blog of No Return</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/?p=254#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] How Many Design Concepts? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Many Design Concepts? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Roebuck</title>
		<link>http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/how-many-design-concepts/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Roebuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/?p=254#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I have to do this all the time and the inevitable always happens initally. The clients picks elements from all all or most of the options and the end result doesn&#039;t always work. I agree with Edd in that it&#039;s important to establish a good working relationship with the client(s) in order for them to understand what&#039;s been produced and why (hey, we do things for a reason) but not only that, you (the designer) have to understand (from being briefed correctly and clearly) what it is the client is wanting. A bit of give and take is usually the best practice - usually!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to do this all the time and the inevitable always happens initally. The clients picks elements from all all or most of the options and the end result doesn&#8217;t always work. I agree with Edd in that it&#8217;s important to establish a good working relationship with the client(s) in order for them to understand what&#8217;s been produced and why (hey, we do things for a reason) but not only that, you (the designer) have to understand (from being briefed correctly and clearly) what it is the client is wanting. A bit of give and take is usually the best practice &#8211; usually!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edd@Wantedd</title>
		<link>http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/how-many-design-concepts/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Edd@Wantedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novolume.co.uk/blogged/?p=254#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

I&#039;ve been in a similar situation a few times - in my experience being approached by the client like that suggests a less than positive experience with a previous agency or designer and has nothing to base your working relationship on until you are quickly into the project.

Retaining the client and building trust and understanding seems to cut down on the red tape of multiple design options. As you&#039;ve obviously experienced you quickly come to a working relationship where you can produce a tailored route and save the client time and money.

Edd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been in a similar situation a few times &#8211; in my experience being approached by the client like that suggests a less than positive experience with a previous agency or designer and has nothing to base your working relationship on until you are quickly into the project.</p>
<p>Retaining the client and building trust and understanding seems to cut down on the red tape of multiple design options. As you&#8217;ve obviously experienced you quickly come to a working relationship where you can produce a tailored route and save the client time and money.</p>
<p>Edd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
